Allan Favish is a Los Angeles-based attorney whose focus is on General Insurance Defense and Litigation Insurance Coverage/Reinsurance & Bad Faith Litigation. A UCLA graduate, he received his J.D. at Hastings College of Law in 1981.
Contact me:
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
begin p. 9
1 requirements."
2 It isn't right on, but it's awfully close. And
3 I can't sit here and -- the mandate is, first of all,
4 analyze the respective interests. Having analyzed the
5 respective interests, who prevails and for what reasons?
6 I told you who prevails and for what reasons, and I
7 don't think that I can get into "Well, the government
8 prevails, but I'm going to give you a remedy and then
9 let you revisit it." I don't think I can do that.
10 If you want to go to the Circuit and try to
11 make some law to that effect, you can, because that's
12 where I was thinking of going; namely, I briefly thought
13 of -- not so briefly, actually. I thought of finding
14 that the government prevailed on a balancing of the
15 interests, privacy interests, but I thought what's the
16 harm, having made that decision, in structuring an
17 arrangement that would nevertheless give Mr. Favish
18 limited access to the photographs, which access would be
19 to visualize the photographs, and to then come back, if
20 indeed there was something there, according to
21 Mr. Favish. Then we go through the balancing once again
22 is the problem.
23 Well, attendant with that, quite obviously, is
24 there is no finality, because predictably you're going
25 to be back here. But more importantly, much more